Skip to main content

tv   The Last Word With Lawrence O Donnell  MSNBC  September 4, 2014 7:00pm-8:01pm PDT

7:00 pm
billion. even for an oil company, that is a ton of money. it can be hard to think in terms of billions, but the potential fine here is enough to wipe out most of bp's profits for 2013, for consider this. when a company is facing a fine or legal judgment, investors tend to feel relief when they find out how much the company is going to have to pay. the stock tends to go up when the fine comes out. but this is what happened to their stock today. it fell off the cliff when they got the news of this potential $18 billion fine. the deep water horizon case is a long, long way of being finished. this finding today does signal that the decisions of giant oil companies sometimes have giant financial consequences. giant consequences, not just for the world they operate in but for their own very, very fat wallet. that does it for us tonight. now time for "the last word with lawrence o'donnell."
7:01 pm
while the same people who urged us into the mistaken war in iraq continue to urge us to return to that war and expand it, president obama met with nato leaders today to try to agree on a strategy for dealing with the islamic state. >> we've got to look before we leap. >> president obama is now at the nato summit in wales. >> maybe one of the most consequence shall meetings of the allies in decades. >> seeking to build a coalition to fight isis. >> we meet at a crucial time in the history of our alliance. >> he and the british prime minister -- >> hosting a joint op-ed in the times of london. >> saying we will not be cowed by barbaric killers. >> make no mistake about the resolve of this government. >> if you're serious about taking isis to the gates of hell, you're going to have to go to syria. >> these are evil barbarians, they can't be negotiated with. >> we're going to have to squeeze it out of existence.
7:02 pm
>> the international community has an obligation. >> the european public is dead set against nato doing anything. >> the west post iraq is very wary. >> the isil threat is a regional threat. >> regional partners will be critical. >> we need the sunni arab countries there to step up. >> not only a military strategy, but a diplomatic strategy. >> put inside syria and iraq, political systems that work. >> it's going to take time. >> the al qaeda threat to the united states is as direct and is as real as isis. >> the world faces many dangerous threats. >> the pressure to act is only increasing. for a new war in iraq and syria growing by the day, anti-war protesters marched outside the nato summit today in newport, wales, where president obama, british prime minister david cameron and other nato leaders
7:03 pm
tried to come up with a strategy for what cameron called squeezing the islamic state out of existence. >> we need to show real resolve and determination. we need to use every power and everything we have in our armory, with our allies, with those on the ground, to make sure we absolutely do all we can to squeeze this dreadful organization out of existence. >> u.s. military forces conducted air strikes against the islamic state today near the mosul dam in iraq. also today, the u.s. central command released video of past air strikes that helped break the islamic state siege in a town about 100 miles north of baghdad. the air strikes were conducted in coordination with ground operations by local militias and kurdish fighters. the pentagon said the strikes were conduct eed under authorit to support humanitarian efforts and support iraqi forces. the iraqi military declared the
7:04 pm
town liberated on sunday. the u.s. has conducted a total of 127 air strikes across iraq since august 8. joining me now, michael boyle, associate professor at la salle university who wrote about the u.s. response for the new york tiles. e.j. dion, columnist for "the washington post," and jay emberger, a contributor to foreign policy who wrote about the relationship between al qaeda and the islamic state. e.j. dion, what should be the discredited voices who supported the war in iraq are now finding every microphone they can in washington to urge us into not just another iraq war but an expanded version that would include syria. >> well, i think what you're seeing is -- i see the debate just a little differently. i see some of those discredited voices saying why didn't
7:05 pm
president obama get in there yesterday or the day before? why isn't he doing more? and i think you said it last night, they have taken the word "dithering" when they are really saying, gee, obama is thinking too much about this. i think what you're seeing from obama and a lot of other people is a view that, look, isis is dangerous. there are a lot of english speakers there. it's one reason why david cameron is so worried. they may have a base in britain. the question is, how do you go about, you know, going after them? what president obama is trying to do is not unlike what the first president bush did. he does not -- he doesn't want to send american troops. he's willing to use air power, but he wants sunni muslim allies fighting along with shiites in iraq to push them back. so he's not trying to launch a
7:06 pm
big american ground war there. and i think that makes this quite different from the iraq war. but i do think that you're right to ask questions about rushing to war. i for one would like to see congress take this up as opposed to just ducking the question until after the elections. >> first of all, let's listen to what john mccain said about this on fox news. >> isis, what are we going to do about them? >> kill them. they've got to be destroyed. >> i would also like to listen to what the foreign policy expert on "duck dynasty" said about this same issue. let's listen to that. >> you either have to convert them, which i think is -- would be next to impossible. i'm not giving up on them, i'm just saying either convert them or kill them. one or the other. >> jay, i didn't really hear a
7:07 pm
difference between john mccain and the "duck dynasty" guy. >> i'm not going to debate the "duck dynasty" guy. i think that's probably not a productive avenue. but i will say that, you know, i live inside this kind of bubble, the kind of terrorism community where we talk about this stuff and we're exposed to this stuff every day. when i step outside that bubble and i've been talking to people who don't do this every day, i am hearing a lot of anger and frustration i haven't heard over the last several years. >> michael boyle, to we have the capacity to eliminate the islamic state? because that's what david cameron says we're going to do, joe biden says we are determined to do. john mccain too. we can just kill every one of them. >> i think we have the capacity if we were willing to invest a substantial military operation, ground troops and a multiyear
7:08 pm
commitment. my concern is i don't think that they're gaining the kind ofs s a assets that they need to. we cannot hold territory with air strikes. one problem that we have is the administration keeps saying we're going to destroy isis. that's fine, but you can't hold territory without ground forces or without having local allies and they haven't articulated a strategy to reclaim that territory. so this is a case where the rhetoric is outrunning the policy. >> e.j., there is the option that america never chooses in these situations, which is to do nothing. >> that is an option. just in terms of a point michael boyle made. i think there is an inconcess t -- inconsistency in the rhetoric we're using, language like crush them, go to the gates of hell, joe biden's terms.
7:09 pm
and yesterday president obama said we want to reduce this to a manageable problem. that's a very different kind of rhetoric. i do think there are times in the past where we have avoided war. it struck me that with all this talk about, gee, there's all this disorder on president obama's watch. well, there's a big war between iraq and iran on president reagan's watch and we didn't feel an obligation to get involved in that. after our marines were blown up in beirut, i don't think they should have been there in the first place, president reagan pulled out the rest of the marines and we didn't choose to engage there. so sometimes we choose not to engage. eisenhower decided not to fight the french war in vietnam and that was good decision. i think in this case, because we are engaged in this effort to contain terrorism, whether it's al qaeda or now isis, obama sees that as part of the same
7:10 pm
mission. it doesn't mean, as i say, that we're going to send american troops there, because i do not think there is the support in the united states or a desire on the part of the administration to send american troops back into iraq in numbers a whole lot beyond where they've already sent a certain number of advisers and people to protect the embassy. >> if we aren't going to send american troops and the idea that they're hatching in nato is to kill everyone we can possibly kill in the islamic state, how many people is that? how many people are involved in this movement called the islamic state and related movements? >> well, the islamic state itself has fighters numbering in the low tens of thousands is the best estimate i've seen. we don't have real good clarity on that. i don't think we can necessarily kill our way to a solution, but certainly lethal force is an option we have in the toolbox. it's a very complicated
7:11 pm
situation. it's a difficult problem. there are a lot of moving parts and one thing we don't have a good handle on is we're just starting to see signs now that they are trying to sort of mobilize themselves outside of iraq, outside of syria with cells in europe. we've seen some arrests. at the same time, it's very obvious from their strategy that they want us to get involved in a broader war there. so, you know, i think any discussion of our military options has to at least acknowledge and take into consideration the fact that this is what they are trying to get us to do. >> why are they trying to get us to do that, in your view? >> this is basically the same strategy that al qaeda articulated back in the day. there's -- in part, it's because they believe the muslim world will galvanize against us. in part, they believe we will overextend ourselves economically and eventually topple. i think al qaeda did its level
7:12 pm
best to implement that strategy, and it did not succeed. but that doesn't mean that we aren't spending more money than we need to on this, that we aren't making some choices that would be better made in other directions. i will say, a lot of my colleagues, a lot of my peers have been very quick with prescriptions for this problem and i've been very slow to make any kind of recommendation, because i really see this as just, you know, a very, very complicated problem and whatever we do is going to have -- whether it's we do something or nothing or something in between, there will almost certainly be some blowback and some negative repercussions to it. >> and it would certainly include unintended consequences, unforeseen in any of the worst case scenarios, we've always experienced that with actions we've taken in that region. >> i agree. this is a very difficult problem with a lot of moving parts and there are a lot of unintended
7:13 pm
consequences that can follow from it. if we do follow isis to the gates of hell as vice president biden suggested we would, that may lead us to engage in air strikes in syria. if that happens, we may be faced into an unsavory alliance with assad, where we have to say you've killed 190,000 of your own citizens and used chemical weapons, we need your messing to engage in air strikes. i think the obama administration is being very careful before marching into syria. does this make sure that we stick with assad after the syrian civil war ends? if not, what is our position in terms of going after isis? i don't see any easy way to do that. >> the islamic state seems to have unified washington politically. we have rand paul now, who was previously against taking actions in this kind of arena, saying absolutely we should be
7:14 pm
bombing and willing to go inside syria, if necessary. >> i think there's -- rand paul has probably looked at recent polls that show even in just the last couple of months, republican opinion has moved toward a much more hawkish position and what looked like a very attractive, noninterventionist libertarian position a couple of months ago is less attractive. one of the reasons isis has unified people more than say the iraq war is i think there was a consensus in the country after 9/11 that it was a legit object of national policy to go after al qaeda and try to prevent another attack. obviously the attack on bin laden was popular. i think people who support this or are sympathetic to doing something see this in connection with the war against -- or the fight against al qaeda, not as a re-creation as the old war in
7:15 pm
iraq. >> thank you all for joining me tonight. >> good to be with you. >> thank you. >> thank you. coming up, guilty verdicts in if corruption trial of former virginia governor bob mcdonnell and his wife. a wipeout for the mcdonnells. we'll have a report from when those verdicts were read. and remembering the first woman to host the "tonight" show and the first woman to have her own late night talk show, joan rivers, who died today at the age of 81. and later, how can you protect your private pictures and what legal remedies do you have when your private photographs are stolen as apparently they're all going to be stolen eventually and all eventually appear online. and a. take 6 tylenol in a day or just 2 aleve for all day relief. onward!
7:16 pm
(vo) ours is a world of the red-eyes. (daughter) i'm really tired. (vo) the transfers. well, that's kid number three. (vo) the co-pilots. all sitting... ...trusting... ...waiting... ...for a safe arrival. introducing the all-new subaru legacy. designed to help the driver in you... for the passenger in them. the subaru legacy. it's not just a sedan. it's a subaru. for over 19 million people. [ mom ] with life insurance, we're not just insuring our lives... we're helping protect his. [ female announcer ] everyone has a moment when tomorrow becomes real. transamerica. transform tomorrow.
7:17 pm
transamerica. oh, he fakes a handoff quaand he's making a run..... for mattress discounters fall kickoff sale! right now, save up to $300 on sealy posturepedic and serta mattress sets. even get 24 months interest-free financing on every tempur-pedic. you're going to love their football field-size selection. this calls for a little touchdown dance. don't miss the fall kickoff sale at mattress discounters. ♪ mattress discounters former virginia governor bob mcdonnell and his wife today had
7:18 pm
to listen to a virginia jury say that they were guilty 20 times today when the verdicts came back. that's next. don't just dream of being the hero. make it happen. i can't believe we're missing the game for this. we're not-- i've got xlte. it doubles our 4g lte bandwidth in cities nationwide, so be that guy with verizon xlte. now get 1gb of bonus data, and our best pricing ever on the more everything plan.
7:19 pm
a federal jury found former virginia governor bob mcdonnell guilty of 11 out of 13 corruption charges today. his wife, maureen, was found guilty of 8 out of 13 charges. bob mcdonnell, who once served as virginia's attorney general, left the courthouse today after his multiple convictions and said only this -- >> governor, anything to say to the people of virginia? governor, do you have anything to say? anything to say for all the virginians watching out this? >> all i can say is my trust remains in the lord. >> joining me now is kelly
7:20 pm
o'donnell who was inside the courtroom when the verdicts were read. and paul butler, a former federal prosecutor and law professor at georgetown university. kelly, take us inside that courtroom. it's very -- maybe one of the only suspense dramas left in public life is the announcement of the jury. this was a long verdict that they had to go through with so many multiple counts, over 25 counts they had to read off between husband and wife. what was that like sitting through that? >> well, there was real tension today, lawrence. and i had a chance to see the jury early in the morning. you can never really get a sense of what's going on in their minds. they had worked over three days, an 17 hours. it was complex. on some counts it involved the former governor and his wife, a count involving one or the other in some instances. so it was hard, tedious work. when the court was brought into session for the reading of the verdicts, it was strikingly
7:21 pm
emotional when that first count was a signal for what else to come. guilty for bob mcdonnell, guilty for his wife. there was a heaving sob that then seemed to pick up and cascade with each of the successive counts. from family members, real emotion. it was one of those moments where you just don't know what the jury is going to do, and when the reality of it confronts you, you can just feel that emotion. now, underneath all of this, lawrence, was a five-week trial, lots of witnesses, lots of information, all about the relationship the mcdonnells had with a virginia businessman, johnny williams, who had provided them with gifts and loans worth about $180,000, with the intention of getting the governor's influence to boost a company johnny williams had that made diet supplements and to get state help for that company. that was the prosecution's case. the main defense argument was that the marriage of the mcdonnells, which was laid bare
7:22 pm
in this trial was so damaged that they couldn't have conspired because they were barely talking. clearly the jury rejected that idea. there were a couple of counts where the mcdonnells were found not guilty. they had to do with false statements to banks, technical things. the overwhelming impact is this was a really sweeping conviction for both of them with serious jail time they will face in january when we learn the sentencing. >> kelly, the verdicts were front loaded with guilties. they had to listen to the word "guilty" seven times when they got to the first not guilty announcement. in a courtroom like that and it starts to keep going in one direction like that, the momentum seems to be -- today could you feel that momentum after the second round of
7:23 pm
guilties, that this is going to keep going in this direction this >> very much so. very much so. in fact, the first time when i heard not guilty associated with maureen mcdonnell, i looked around thinking did everyone else hear not guilty? that involved the former governor having direct contact with johnny williams. later on, there was an instance where both of them were not found guilty on certain counts. it almost seemed like there would be no counts come back not guilty. once you hear it on conspiracy, you understood that the jury saw there had been an agreement. the exchange, the power of the office for practical things, not so practical in the material sense, but actual things. we're talking about catering for their daughter's wedding, use of a ferrari at a country club, a
7:24 pm
shopping spree in new york. things that are high living on a public servant's bank account. that was apparently the problem. they were under great financial strains, and they took these gifts, which under state law was not specifically against the law. that's why this is a federal case. you can expect virginia law will change over time to reflect some of this. but very damning for someone who, as you know, lawrence, had been talked about as a potential presidential candidate or a short lister for a vp slot on the republican ticket, having had a fairly successful time as the republican governor of virginia. that term ended in january and his life is very, very difficult tonight. lawrence? >> paul butler, some of the worst legal analysis you can hear on television is from political pundits. we've had a lot saying what's the big deal here? where is the quid pro quo. what did the governor do for this fie?
7:25 pm
he left him have an appointment here and there. explain what he was convicted of and how it is different from bribery and what that jury actually found him guilty of today. >> so he was convicted of a number of conspiracy charges, as was mrs. mcdonnell. a technical crime called theft of honest services. but what it meant was, this businessman was giving him all this bling-bling, these rolex watches, sending him on shopping sprees. he says that all he was doing as governor is what he would doing for any business. he was promoting the business in ways that he promotes any business of the state. the jury just didn't buy that. what they're saying is, this isn't business as usual. the defense subtext is, everybody knows this is how politics works. you scratch my back, i scratch
7:26 pm
yours. the jury said in virginia, no more. >> paul butler, the federal officials, they live under rules that say they cannot accept these kinds of gifts under any circumstances. there's no am b ambiguity about. they all know it. but this governor seemed to think at some point that this was going to be okay. his guide seem to be more virginia law and he maybe had an ignorance of what federal law said. >> it wasn't an obvious case for federal prosecution. as kelly said, the virginia law hadn't quite caught up. i think now it will. of course, the governor is bound by federal law. so a number of these investigations of governors, including governor christie in new jersey, it's the feds who are moving forward. >> thank you both very much for joining me tonight. >> great to be here.
7:27 pm
coming up, today's big development in what is now the new senate race to watch this year in kansas. and later, photo hacking and keeping private photos private. hey mom. yeah? we got allstate, right? uh-huh. yes! well, i found this new thing... called allstate quickfoto claim. it's an app. you understand that? just take photos of the damage with your phone and upload them to allstate. really? so you get a quicker estimate, quicker payment, quicker back to normal. i just did it. but maybe you can find an app that will help you explain this to your father. introducing quickfoto claim. just another way allstate is changing car insurance for good. sweets become salaries. an oven heats up a community la cocina, a small kitchen that kick-starts the careers of 41 entrepreneurs.
7:28 pm
they bring the talent. we help fund the tools. it's a small way we help that's been huge for the community. little by little we can do a lot. because... small is huge. visit to see how big small can be. you are loved a lot. and in so many ways.
7:29 pm
and when you're wrapped in the comfort of pampers swaddlers with blanket-like softness and up to 12 hours of protection, all you feel is love. wishing you love, sleep and play. pampers. so what we're looking for is a way to "plus" our accounting firm's mobile plan. and "minus" our expenses. perfect timing. we're offering our best-ever pricing on mobile plans for business. run the numbers on that. well, unlimited talk and text, and ten gigs of data for the five of you would be... one-seventy-five a month. good calculating kyle. good job kyle. you just made partner. our best-ever pricing on mobile share value plans for business. now with a $100 bill credit for every business line you add.
7:30 pm
7:31 pm
in if spotlight tonight, kansas, again. another dramatic development in the race for united states senate in kansas. last night democratic candidate chad taylor suddenly terminated his campaign to unseat incumbent republican senator pat roberts, giving the independent candidate dpreg orman a real chance of becoming the first non-republican senator from kansas since the 1930s. but today, the republican secretary of state in kansas said that the democrat, chad taylor, must remain on the ballot. he says that taylor failed to follow kansas election law because he did not declare that he is incapable of serving in the united states senate. chad taylor said he will
7:32 pm
challenge the decision to keep his name on the ballot. but this afternoon, the secretary of state, who is a member of pat robertson's honorary statewide campaign committee said, this has nothing to do with party. the law is the law. joining me now is steve kornacki. steve, it looks like this might be a case of the law is the law. >> yeah, i've seen the law is the law in other states and courts have stepped in and done some funky things. in judge, they allowed frank lautenberg back on a ballot 30 days before the election. if he name appears on the ballot, what is that threshold? he'll get some votes, but the question is at what point does it make a difference between orman win thing thing and not just having enough anti-pat robert votes out there to carry it? >> the law seems to indicate to
7:33 pm
get your name off the ballot, you have to certify -- after you've been nominated, you have to certify you're incapable of serving in the senate. even if that happens, they turn to the party and say give us another name. so it's kind of -- it looks like the first read of kansas law is it's got to be a name in a democratic slot. >> the interesting thing is chad taylor said he had communication with the secretary of state with his office asking him if it was permissible and how to do it. he's saying basically i wouldn't have done this unless the secretary of state's office told me it was okay. >> yeah. but it seems the best case scenario now for what they seem to believe trying to do, which is the democrats in kansas seem to be saying look, we can't win. let's see what we can do to get the independent to win. the best thing for them is just to leave that name on the ballot
7:34 pm
that presumably everyone will know by november. this guy isn't really running. there will be enough press attention to that in kansas. it would seem the kansas voter would be able to understand that by november, by tonight. >> the interesting thing, chad taylor was not a name in kansas politics. the district attorney from the topeka area, he barely got the nomination. there were two names on the ballot. neither one of them spent any money. the national party, the state party was not behind either one of them. chad taylor won that with 53% of the vote. this is the highest profile thing he's done is dropping out of this race. you're looking to parallels trying to see what kind of effect'9" has to just have a
7:35 pm
name -- i can think of -- there was a special election where a republican actually dropped out of the race about a week before the election and enforced the democrat. her name was still on the ballot. there was a conservative candidate too. she got about 5% of the vote as i recall. >> that's in a much narrower time frame. steve, it turns out you have the big get of the week already on video because you've already interviewed greg orman. suddenly the hottest senate candidate in the country. let's listen to some of that. >> i'm fiscally responsible and socially tolerant and never felt like i had a perfect home in either party. i've tried the republican and democratic party historically, but if we're fog to change things in washington, we have to attack the two-party system and stop supporting it. >> steve, you're way ahead of us on this story, you had him on
7:36 pm
last month knowing this was coming. but would you say he handled that interview? he seemed to -- sounded like a genuine independent. >> yeah. he sounded like somebody who knows how to win an election in a state that has. sent a democrat to the senate since the great depression. i asked him who will you vote for in race for governor of kansas? he wouldn't even go on the record and say who he's going to vote for. he said he doesn't think it's his place to share publicly how he votes. so it's obvious he will go through his campaign and will not say during his campaign i will vote to make the democrats the majority party or the republicans. democrats are making the bet that he's likely to vote for him after this election and they need him, they're making the bet that he's likely to do that.
7:37 pm
the risk in all this for him is that because of that, because the democrats dropped out of this race, because the democrats are kind of doing this wink and nold thing here that he gets tarred as the de facto democratic candidate in kansas. so i doubt he's going to change his tune at all. he's going to keep trying to talk that way and separate himself from the democratic party as much as he can. the question is, do voters continue to treat him as independent or treat him as a democrat? if he's just a democrat in kansas, he gets in trouble this year. >> republican senator pat roberts' first statement last night linked him to harry reid. steve, thank you very much for joining us. his show is "up" on the weekends here on msnbc. i will be watching this weekend as always. coming up, the reporter who conducted what turned out to be joan rivers' last interview will
7:38 pm
join me. don't think "feed the hungry" when you think aarp, then you don't know "aarp". our drive to end hunger has donated 29 million meals, and counting. find more real possibilities at i wish... please, please, please, please, please. [ male announcer ] the wish we wish above health. so we quit selling cigarettes in our cvs pharmacies. expanded minuteclinic, for walk-in medical care. and created programs that encourage people to take their medications regularly. introducing cvs health. a new purpose. a new promise... to help all those wishes come true. cvs health. because health is everything.
7:39 pm
cvs health. dad,thank you mom for said this oftprotecting my thank you for being my hero and my dad. military families are uniquely thankful for many things, the legacy of usaa auto insurance could be one of them. if you're a current or former military member or their family, get an auto insurance quote and see why 92% of our members plan to stay for life. smoking with chantix. for 33 years i chose to keep smoking... ...because it was easier to smoke than it was to quit. along with support, chantix (varenicline) is proven to help people quit smoking. it's a non-nicotine pill. chantix reduced the urge for me to smoke. it actually caught me by surprise. some people had changes in behavior, thinking or mood, hostility, agitation, depressed mood and suicidal thoughts or actions while taking or after stopping chantix. if you notice any of these, stop chantix and call your doctor right away. tell your doctor about any history of mental health problems, which could
7:40 pm
get worse while taking chantix. don't take chantix if you've had a serious allergic or skin reaction to it. if you develop these, stop chantix and see your doctor right away as some could be life threatening. tell your doctor if you have a history of heart or blood vessel problems, or if you develop new or worse symptoms. get medical help right away if you have symptoms of a heart attack or stroke. use caution when driving or operating machinery. common side effects include nausea, trouble sleeping and unusual dreams. i did not know what it was like to be a non-smoker. but i do now. ask your doctor if chantix is right for you. this is me. and it's because of my regimen, which is a shake for breakfast, a shake for lunch, and plastic surgery for dinner. >> that was joan rivers. with me here on "the last word" a few years ago. we'll have more about joan next. work with equity experts
7:41 pm
who work with regional experts who work with portfolio management experts that's when expertise happens. mfs. because there is no expertise without collaboration. while a body in motion tends to stay in motion. staying active can ease arthritis symptoms but if you have arthritis, this can be difficult. prescription celebrex can help relieve arthritis pain, so your body can stay in motion. because just one 200mg celebrex a day can provide 24 hour relief for many with arthritis pain and inflammation. plus, in clinical studies, celebrex is proven to improve daily physical function so moving is easier. and it's not a narcotic. you and your doctor should balance the benefits with the risks. all prescription nsaids, like celebrex, ibuprofen, naproxen and meloxicam have the same cardiovascular warning.
7:42 pm
they all may increase the chance of heart attack or stroke, which can lead to death. this chance increases if you have heart disease or risk factors such as high blood pressure or when nsaids are taken for long periods. nsaids, like celebrex, increase the chance of serious skin or allergic reactions, or stomach and intestine problems, such as bleeding and ulcers, which can occur without warning and may cause death. patients also taking aspirin and the elderly are at increased risk for stomach bleeding and ulcers. don't take celebrex if you have bleeding in the stomach or intestine, or had an asthma attack, hives, other allergies to aspirin, nsaids or sulfonamides. get help right away if you have swelling of the face or throat, or trouble breathing. tell your doctor your medical history. and ask your doctor about celebrex. for a body in motion. and now celebrex may be available for as little as $4 a month. terms and conditions apply. to learn more, go to ugh. heartburn. did someone say burn? try alka seltzer reliefchews. they work just as fast and taste better than tums smoothies assorted fruit. mmm. amazing.
7:43 pm
yeah, i get that a lot. alka seltzer heartburn reliefchews. enjoy the relief. for over 19 million people. [ susan ] my promotion allowed me to start investing for my retirement. transamerica made it easy. [ female announcer ] everyone has a moment when tomorrow becomes real. transamerica. transform tomorrow. i am so noh my, it's not even funny. driver 1 you ready? yeah! go! [sfx] roaring altima engine woah! ahhhha! we told people they were riding nissan's most advanced altima race car. we lied... about the race car part. altima, with 270 horsepower and active understeer control. how did you?...what! i don't even, i'm speechless. innovation that excites. i wish i could tell you it
7:44 pm
gets better, but it doesn't get better. you get better. i've gone up, i've gone down, i've gone bankrupt, i've been broke. but you do it, and you do it because -- because we love it more than anything else. what we do is a calling, my dear. we make people happy. it's a calling. >> melissa rivers announced this afternoon that her mother, joan rivers, died peacefully at mt. sinai hospital in new york city today. joan was 81 years old. in a statement, she said, my mother's greatest joy in life was to make people laugh, although that is difficult to do right now. i know her final wish would be that we return to laughing soon. >> can we talk?
7:45 pm
i went into a store today and i said what do you have to go with this suit? she gave me a bottle of cheap wine. why should a woman cook, so her husband can say my wife makes a delicious cake to some hooker? gwyneth paltrow, i just love to see anything straight. that dress has more creases than my face did before botox. they sent a stretch limo for us and it got stuck and wouldn't move for 2 1/2 years. i'm thinking the germans killed 6 million jews and you can't fix a [ bleep ] car? >> welcome back to the network, joan. >> joining me now is tim, senior editor for the daily beast. tim, what was your conversation like in july with joan rivers? >> good evening. it was absolutely wonderful. it was one of the most
7:46 pm
pleasurable interviews i've done for many years. it was in the russian tearoom in new york. it was in a very lovely banquet. she had been followed all day which a tv crew. when you read the piece on the daily beast, she talked about everything. sex, her feelings about mortality, her feelings about melissa, her daughter who she loved very much and was very worried about leaving should she ever die. by i should say, there was no sense that joan was frail that day. she wasn't ill. she was in good form. she was very unusual for a comedian. she was as good off stage as she was on. the jokes were always there. she was extremely funny. extremely serious when she wanted to be serious. just, as you know yourself, just one of those all-around zinging interviews. when you leave the room, you're like thanks, joan, that was
7:47 pm
wonderful. >> there's always a remarkable energy driving everything she said, both in her act and when she was trying to be funny privately. >> absolutely. she told me on more than one occasion that what she most feared was not working. joan rivers loved to work. i don't know if you saw the wonderful documentary that was made about her in 2010 called "a piece of work." but that showed you that she was getting off planes, getting onto stages. that was the most important thing to her, being in the game, staying relevant. she didn't have to work at being relevant. she was absolutely couched in pop culture. look what she did for e's "fashion police." there she is, 81 years old, addressing a much younger age and they adored her. if you can ask what gave her her focus, it was working and
7:48 pm
staying working. she loved it. when i asked her about retirement in july, she said, why would i do that? she got up every day and she worked. she just had supper with barbara walters the night before she saw me, and she queried with barbara, she said you're going to go crazy. you'll see somebody doing a terrible interview on tv saying i should be do that. so joan loved to work. she lived for it. she also lived for her family, who she absolutely adored. if you talked about death with her, the prospect of death, what worried her about dying and mortality was the prospect of leaving melissa and cooper, her grandson. >> well, she thought of everything and she joked about everything, including her funeral in her 2012 book, she wrote this about her funeral. she said --
7:49 pm
>> tim, can we expect some of that in joan's funeral? >> if we don't have some of that in the funeral, i think we can expect thunder claps from heaven to ring out. so yes, respect joan rivers' last wishes. she clearly wanted to die in the way she lived, which was dramatically and on the edge. look what we had here. she's still singular amongst comediennes and many people took a pin to the great balloon of hollywood ego and said, enough already. she never thought she was rude.
7:50 pm
she thought she was telling the truth and she lived very -- she didn't live extravagantly. the irony of joan rivers is i said to her, look, if you retired, you could give it up, joan. you're always well off. she said, i've always been salaried. i interviewed her once in her gorgeous apartment, and it was amazing, a butler brought us brandies on a silver platter. but she worked for every penny and she was serious about working for every penny. she had the old school trouper thing about her. so yes, give her that funeral. otherwise we'll all suffer weather wise on sunday. >> tim, thank you very much for joining us tonight. >> thank you very much. when we come back, what you and every celebrity apparently need to know about keeping private pictures private.
7:51 pm
[ inhales deeply ] [ sighs ] [ inhales ] [ male announcer ] at cvs health, we took a deep breath... [ inhales, exhales ] [ male announcer ] and made the decision to quit selling cigarettes in our cvs pharmacies. now we invite smokers to quit, too, with our comprehensive program. we just want to help everyone, everywhere, breathe a little easier. introducing cvs health. because health is everything.
7:52 pm
7:53 pm
introducing cvs health. (vo) ours is a world of the red-eyes. (daughter) i'm really tired. (vo) the transfers. well, that's kid number three. (vo) the co-pilots. all sitting... ...trusting... ...waiting... ...for a safe arrival. introducing the all-new subaru legacy. designed to help the driver in you... for the passenger in them. the subaru legacy. it's not just a sedan. it's a subaru. don't just dream of being the hero. make it happen. i can't believe we're missing the game for this. we're not-- i've got xlte. it doubles our 4g lte bandwidth in cities nationwide, so be that guy with verizon xlte.
7:54 pm
now get 1gb of bonus data, and our best pricing ever on the more everything plan. we are a collection of smalls. a home saved. a hero homebound for a new opportunity. a kitchen that kick starts careers wells fargo invests in our communities a little differently. small measures that add up to make our whole even greater. little by little we can do a lot. because... small is huge. visit to see how big small can be. 500 years ago we did not have the internet, but we did have porn. here is one of our most enduring pieces of porn, venus of erbino, painted in 1538, and still proudly hanging on display in
7:55 pm
florence. and from the same period we have michelangelo's matthew mcconaughey. well, okay, it's not mcconaug y mcconaughey's hair. and when we look at venus today or michelangelo's david, we don't think how shameful and embarrassing for the models to have their naked images on display publicly for 500 years. but when americans are offered more recent images of naked people, the puretism, that is the foundational perversity of the united states of america, always controls the dialogue. and so when celebrities' pift naked photographs are stolen and exhibited for public view, shock is the mandatory public reaction instead of recognizing that we were all born into this world naked and human beings have been sharing naked imagery of human
7:56 pm
beings for as long as we have been able to create imagery. and we always will share naked imagery of human beings. but we just can't seem to find our way to the obvious conclusion that what is normal is not embarrassing, and naked is normal and naked imagery is normal and not shameful in any way and should not be embarrassing in any way. in today's world of electronic sharing of naked imagery, what are the best ways to keep that sharing private? and what are the legal remedies for violating that privacy? joining me now, an attorney who specializes in internet law, including so-called revenge porn. mitchell, what is the state of the law on this stuff? what kind of control do people have of images of themselves that are stolen or revealed against their will? >> thanks, lawrence, for having me. there are two issues here. one is the criminal aspect, one
7:57 pm
is a civil aspect. there are people working to criminalize the posting of these private photographs in states across the country. and that is one aspect of it. the problem right now is that this behavior, although wrong, falls wp the gaps in the criminal laws which did not have this behavior in mind. the other side of it is the civil side, which is a remedy that the individuals who were victimized by this would have against the websites that actually post these -- host these photographs. the revenge porn industry is growing. it is a big money maker. and the problem right now is that as the federal law is written, these websites are largely immune from being sued by the victims. >> what is the revenge porn industry? who is making money in that? this is porn where a couple has created these photos, then the couple breaks up and one of them
7:58 pm
decides i'm going to make this public because i'm angry at him or her. >> yeah, revenge porn is a subset. i prefer the term involuntary porn, because there isn't always a revenge aspect to it, as is the case with jennifer lawrence. people can have their phones hacked into somebody that doesn't know them. so people take these pictures and the problem is when they take the pictures, once they're reduced to electronic form in particular, they become vulnerable to hacking or distribution by the ex-boyfriend or by anybody. and what happens is that these websites are set up to host this type of image, and people can upload those images anonymously. the we believe sites make it a point not to track the ip addresses, so there's no way to figure out who did it.
7:59 pm
then they post these pictures on the website. some of these sites have tens of thousands of photographs of thousands upon thousands of women and men also. >> who owns the copyright to these private photographs? >> that's a complex issue. if the photograph is taken by the victim him or herself, then they own the copyright. if the photograph is taken by the boyfriend or girlfriend, they technically own the copyright. so although there is an exemption in the federal immunity for intellectual property claim such as copyright, it becomes problematic when the pictures were not taken by the victim. so the victim can try to sue the website itself if she owns the copyright. the problem is trying to figure out who to sue. these people who run the websites are very keen on invading the privacy of everybody else, but take great steps to remain anonymous themselves.
8:00 pm
they hide behind proxies and host the websites on foreign computers and that sort of thing. so determining who to sue becomes a big problem. and there's tonight, we are "all in." >> we want wages! >> supersized! >> day of action across the nation. fast food workers fighting for a higher wage take to the streets in 159 cities and over 400 arrests. and we were there as mcdonald's workers from ferguson, missouri, were arrested. a bunch of protesters sat down blocking this intersection. then the former governor of virginia and the wife he trashed on the stand found guilty of corruption. >> all i can say is my trust rema


info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on